The Congruent Leader – An Exercise

The Congruent Leader – An Exercise

This is not my next real post in the series, it is just an amuse-bouche delivered to cleanse your palate between regular posts.

After my first post in The Congruent Leader series I got a request to give an example of Congruence and my spontaneous reaction was “Oh yes, of course.” I’ve been considering the topic since and I realized that an example will not make the topic justice. It’s quite easy to give examples of incongruence, for example whenever we blame, placate or ignore around important issues. Congruence though is all about the Self, the Other and the Context and all of these perspectives are so complex in themselves that it’s impossible to convey the preconditions in such a way that we even begin to do them justice in a way where we all see the same situation. What is Congruent to me might not be your Congruent response to the same situation because it will not be the same situation when we switch places. After thinking about this I decided to offer an exercise instead for you to self evaluate your responses and options to see which ones you find most Congruent. Feel free to reach out if you’re interested in talking about your ideas after doing this exercise. My hope is that the upcoming posts in this series will help you with tools to come up with even more Congruent options in the future if you follow my blog. If anyone finds this exercise valuable I will try to come up with more in the future and I think it might be interesting to revisit them as I add on tools.

The exercise I’ll describe is taken from a real world example with additional complexity that I won’t disclose here but I found the situation in itself useful as a thought experiment. If the person who shared this with me originally happens to find their way here I hope that you’re ok with me borrowing some of the set-up.

Exercise:

Empty movie theater

Imagine yourself sitting in a movie theater. Mid-movie you get a phone call and it turns out that you had forgotten to set you phone on silent. While you’re fumbling with your phone to turn it off the person next to you in the theater stares at you and loudly in a very disdainful tone proclaims: “You need to stop that crap immediately!”

Consider that the person next to you is:

  • A family member
  • A person you’re with on a first date
  • An unknown old man
  • An unknown teenage girl
  • A biker with a vest signaling membership in a criminal gang

The movie is:

  • A silly rom-com
  • Schindler’s list

Questions to consider in the different scenarios:

  • What would be your spontaneous response in this situation?
  • What could be a more Congruent response to the situation?
  • Do you have access to all possible responses or are there external factors that limit your choices? What are they and why?
  • Are there internal factors where you yourself are taking away the possibility of certain responses? What are they and why?
  • How does your age, gender, ethnicity and social status affect the situation and your response? To whom might this be an entirely different situation?

Keep in mind how Congruence is about taking Self, Other and Context into account. What is the Context and how does it affect the situation? Who is the Other and in what ways do you account for them?

Can you be apologetic without placating? Can you be angry without blaming? Can you be objective without acting like a robot? Can you acknowledge all your feelings? Can you empathize with the other? 

What is Congruence to you in this movie theater?

The Congruent Leader – Self Mandala

The Congruent Leader – Self Mandala

If this is your first visit to this blog series, a bit of background might be useful for you but I hope that each post will be able to bring value on its own as well.

Previous posts:

In my previous post on Congruence I mentioned the importance of balancing Self, Other and Context in our communication. I’m planning on going more in depth on what these different parts entail in the next few posts. First out is the Self.  

Being fully Congruent to oneself is extremely difficult since it involves having access to a breadth of tools while at the same time being conscious about all the different depths of the unique person that I am. It takes conscious effort to do this and we won’t have the will or energy to do it all the time so Congruence is a gift that we can offer ourselves and other people but it can not be taken for granted. Please remember that; Congruence is always a conscious effort that we can make, we may not always consider every person and every situation worthwhile our effort to be congruent but the choice that we make will always affect the quality of our interactions.

Virginia had one metaphor for describing our breadth of resources; the Self Mandala, and one metaphor for talking about the depth of our person; the Iceberg. They are not orthogonal to each other but rather affect each other on all levels but I will treat them a bit more simplistic as I describe these metaphors in this and my next post. 

The Self Mandala

The Self mandala was Virginias way of talking about the breadth of tools we can access to use all aspects of ourselves. She divided the Mandala into eight different dimensions; the Spiritual, the Contextual, the Nutritional, the Interactional, the Sensual, the Emotional, the Intellectual and the Physical. Each dimension represents one of our resources in isolation, but the dimensions are also deeply interconnected with each other and affect one another in reinforcing ways both positive and negative.

Illustration of Satir Self Mandala

Spiritual – this part of the Mandala relates to our relationships to whatever each of us identifies as bigger than ourselves. It could be a belief system, some thoughts about meaning of life or whatever life force we might acknowledge. For religious people this might be easy to fathom but for those of us having a secular worldview this part of the Mandala can seem difficult to grasp or even redundant. Personally I find it as a way for me to consider if I can have a purpose in anything ‘good’ that is larger than myself and that will hopefully survive myself. Perhaps something as simple as this quote by Elton Trueblood:
“A man has made at least a start on discovering the meaning of human life when he plants shade trees under which he knows full well he will never sit.”

No matter what our view on the Spiritual side is, it will be an important part of our value system and in being Congruent to ourselves we must acknowledge these values and nurture them with our integrity. It doesn’t mean that they can’t change and that we shouldn’t stay curious to alternatives, but at any given moment, our current value system are a large part of what defines us.

Physical – our body, all parts of it, has always been one of our greatest resources. It has been intrinsic in both taking us to the communications but also as an expression for a large part of the communication. This makes it an essential part of our Congruent communication. A body that does not deliver the same message as our words and intention, is at its best only confusing but at its worst a signal that we’re not being true to ourselves or the Other. Today we are able to meet other people without being there in person as well but the wellbeing of our bodies is still on top of the list of importance. When our body is taken care of we have a much higher chance of being rewarded with it responding to our needs with good health and working abilities. The dependencies between our physical wellbeing and all other parts of the Self Mandala are strong and it’s often not obvious why the physical parts of ourselves are not working or responding in the ways we want them to, so in order to keep one of our most important tools for communication in good shape we also need to attend to all of our other resources.

Intellectual – our reasoning parts. This is the part of us that does conscious processing and planning, the part that we use for deliberate learning and reflecting. If we lack curiosity, this is the part that will be stifled in its’ growth most obviously. We need to keep feeding our intellectual dimension by asking questions and listening attentively to the answers in order for it to stay in balance and work in our favor. It is also important to remember that intellect without empathy and compassion just puts us in the same league as computers and robots. We need our thoughts and our emotions to collaborate for us to stay Congruent and when there’s a dissonance between the two, we need to acknowledge that and be able to reflect on why. 

Emotional – this is everything that relates to our feelings and inner emotions. Unlike our physical body, our emotions will not be broken but our relationships with them can be more or less healthy and they may work more or less well for us. When this part of the Mandala is in imbalance, it is not the feelings themselves that are wrong but we might have to look at our acceptance of them and also why we are having them. An honesty towards why we are having certain feelings might reveal new ways of coping with them which in turn might change the feelings themselves.

Sensual – our senses that help us perceive the world around us through sound, sight, taste, smell and touch. These are often seen as ‘objective’ sensors that are reading data from our environment but their objectiveness is strongly skewed by both physical limitations as well as our past that has taught us to filter and interpret the data in ways that might have been beneficial to us at some point in time. The touch of a loved one might feel completely different from a similar but unwanted touch by someone we don’t like. To be Congruent we need to employ all our senses to understand what is going on but we also need to be aware of their imperfectness. The alliance with physical well-being is important for our senses but sometimes we have to cope with them slowly or suddenly degenerating by illness, accident, genetics or just age. This makes it even more important for our Congruence to be transparent with the limitations of our senses to Other and Self and be open to the fact that things are not always what they seem to be.

Interactional – this represents our relationships and interactions with the people we meet but also our inner dialogue. We are all dependent on healthy relationships with people around us and many of us suffer deeply when these relationships are hurting, starving or as during the Corona pandemic, being cut off to a large extent. It is often through our relationships with other people that we get both mental as well as physical input to our lives. While our needs for interactions with other people may differ from person to person, none of us grow from loneliness. We grow as individuals and as a society through interactions and Congruence without interactions is just a small broken chip out of a beautiful piece of art.

Nutritional – this part of the Mandala relates to what we feed our bodies, the food, drinks and other substances that we consume in various ways. Certain parts are vital for survival and other things might increase our enjoyment while some might be feeding an addiction. All of them together will affect our well-being strongly but the balance is difficult to strike since some indulgence might increase our physical and mental health while other is directly detrimental to it. The nutritional dimension will strongly affect our physical parts and our emotional parts often affects how we approach the nutritional dimension. The nutritional part of the Self Mandala is to a large extent about nurturing other parts.

Contextual – this is about the physical surroundings here and now. We will be talking about Context in a wider sense in later posts but for the Mandala, Context involves time, light, sound, space, color, temperature and other physical traits of our environment. The environment that we currently reside in will affect all other parts of the Mandala. Remembering history and being able to plan for the future are extremely important skills but in staying Congruent it is crucial that we are present in the Here and the Now.

Caring for Self is about caring for all of these aspects, striving for a balance within them and between them. The Mandala is like a wheel that needs to be balanced and even all around. It is a system where all parts interact and any attempt to optimize one aspect will most likely end up shaping the wheel unevenly and ensure a bumpy ride. Congruence comes from our ability to be aware of, cater to and to have access to all of these different parts. 

The Congruent Leader – Self-Esteem

Self-Esteem, self-worth or the ability to love one-self is important to all of us and it’s a crucial quality for the Congruent Leader. As a leader in any form, our main objective is to empower people around us and to help them grow. If we try to lead from a place of low self-worth where we are unable to love ourselves and unable to see how we bring value to the world, we expect other people to see us the same way and treat us accordingly. With low self-esteem we will meet the world and everyone around us with fear and distrust. On the other hand, when we come from a place where we love ourselves, we know that we are worthy of other people’s love and respect as well. We want people around us to feel the same way and can afford them the space to feel lovable and competent.

People with high self-esteem are able to accept and appreciate all different feelings that they experience. They own those feelings and don’t have a need to apply inflexible rules to them such as “men can not cry”, “I can not show anger” or “vulnerability is a weakness”. High self-esteem allows people to act on the entire spectrum of feelings but also gives us the confidence and understanding that we don’t always have to act them out. With high self-esteem we get access to endless possibilities and choices that low self-esteem takes away. By having a healthy sense of self-worth we can move beyond reacting to events around us and start responding out of many choices, even be proactive in creating the reality we want to live in. 

Self-Esteem

According to Virgina Satir, Congruence could only emerge from a state of high self-esteem so in addition to giving us a plethora of small tools that can help us deal with the present, Virginia also had the longterm goal of helping her clients, and really all of us, to strengthen our self-esteem. 

An important idea in Virginia’s teaching was that we all have the tools needed to make changes, to make better choices, for healthier communication and to become more Congruent. Examples of these tools are the ability to learn new things, the ability to take action even when we feel intimidated and the ability to let other people know what we need (more on the Self-Esteem Toolkit in a later post). Our ability to access these tools may vary though and usually based on the level of worth we are able to ascribe to ourselves. With a good sense of self-esteem we have better access to these tools and with a low level of self-esteem we tend to lose touch with them. This builds re-enforcing feedback loops between our self-esteem and our tools for seeing options and making healthy choices. These tools are also strongly connected to a growth mindset and our sense of self-efficacy. If we see challenges as something we can master rather than threats to be avoided we generally increase our sense of self-esteem. Self-esteem is not about our ability to solve particular problems, however it is strongly connected to how we see ourselves as having the ability to, as Virginia wrote, “survive, to be close to others, to be productive, and to make sense and order out of the world of people and things outside of me”.

Our starting points may differ widely. We learn to define our self-worth from our parents and other family members, from peers in school and at work. Depending on the love and validation we received as kids, the tools for being Congruent and for dealing with change will either be given to us or hidden from us. Virginia wrote “Feelings of worth can only flourish in an atmosphere where individual differences are appreciated, mistakes are tolerated, communication is open, and rules are flexible – the kind of atmosphere that is found in a nurturing family.” The good news are that even if we were dealt a poor hand to begin with, we can always relearn and grow our self-esteem. Surrounding ourselves with the right people is a good starting place and Congruent leaders, the ones who are already capable of loving themselves, can often be the right people. 

The Congruent Leader – Congruence

The Congruent Leader – Congruence

The concept of Congruence was a central part of Virginia Satir’s teachings. Her idea was that in order for us to truly connect with other people and ourselves we need to, from a place of strong self-esteem, fully honor and appreciate our selves, the other person and the context we are currently in. From this state of wholeness where we are fully present, accepting and accountable, we can act and communicate in a way where we have access to all our internal and external resources and where our feelings, intent, affect and communication all align. The power of Congruence lies in the authenticity we offer to ourselves and people around us and the choices we get access to when we’re not limiting ourselves through the rules of “I ought to …”, “I should not …”, “I can never …”, “I must always …” and the likes.

Self Other Context
Three Dimensions of Communication

Virgina identified three parts that we must fully honor in order to be Congruent; the Self, the Other and the Context. We need to act with  compassion and caring for ourselves as well as the other person we are interacting with. While doing this we also need to stay aware of the current context and appreciate its uniqueness. As soon as we fail to fully acknowledge one of these three parts we will move towards Incongruence (more on this in later posts).

Virginia Satir's Survival Stances
Congruence and Incongruence

Being Congruent is not about smooth sailing and constant happiness. It doesn’t mean that we are trying to push our own agenda. Neither does it mean being servant or even polite to the other person. It does mean that in this given point in time, we are fully present and aligned with all parts of ourself while also giving the Other and the Context the same level of attention and degrees of freedom.

A Congruent Leader is not a person who is alway Congruent. It is to me a person who understands what it means to be Congruent, who manages to chose Congruency more often and who can recognize in themself when they are not being Congruent. I strongly believe that the Congruent Leader will help people around them grow and in doing so also helps the systems (organizations, communities etc) that they reside in to flourish. When we are Congruent and communicate Congruently we also give permission to everyone else to do the same. We help people grow their self-esteem and self-efficacy by allowing them to access their own resources in a similar fashion.

When I talk about the Congruent Leader I will be quite specific about Congruency but also quite liberal in what I mean by a leader. We all lead in different situations and by being Congruent we automatically radiate some of the most important qualities of a true leader; presence and empowerment. The Congruent leader is anyone and everyone who displays the qualities we associate with a true leader, who inspire us to grow and to be the best we can in an agreed upon direction.

My upcoming posts will continue to explore the topics of how to stay more Congruent. I aim to write about tools for how to raise our awareness and attend to the Self, the Other and the Context in different ways as well as going into the concept of Congruence in more detail. This writing is ongoing and emergent so the order of the posts will not necessarily be logical and the conclusions I draw will hopefully evolve but my hope is that this will add clarity to the end product in its own way.